Supersonic |
12-12-2018 02:27 PM |
Aloha !
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper
(Post 1249417)
This post right here is the exact problem with today's music and how these singing competitions destroyed the entire music industry... Just because Oli can hit a note or two better than Jon in 1995 doesn't make him a better singer by any means.
|
Yes, it does. It's not just hitting a note or two, it's everything. Olli's capable of singing everything better than Jon does. Just because you prefer Jon's tone over Olli doesn't take away Olli's a better singer. Olli's capable of singing anything out of the Bon Jovi catalog at ease while Jon's never been capable of doing so. You seem to have gotten so used to Jon's nasal tone and technique that it's as if you've forgotten what real vocals sound like. The vocals from Keep The Faith are closer to Olli's live sound than they are to Jon's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdkopper
(Post 1249417)
Back in 1995 Jon had better control, zero breathing issues even when running around the stage, his musical phrasing was spot on, his tone is his signature obviously, but most of all the guy could deliver a song with passion like no other...
|
Yeah, I'm not disagreeing with that at all and I'm not denying Jon was a great singer in 1995. I prefer it over pretty much anything he's done after but for whatever reason people on here seem to think Jon was capable of singing everything back then. He just wasn't. Jon's voice has always had it's downfalls. In the eighties he'd never been able to sing the nineties stuff, in the nineties he's never been able to sing the eighties stuff. Comparing it to a talent show sounds rather ignorant, really. It's a completely different ball game.
You obviously care a great deal about the passion and stage presence and what not whereas I don't give a **** and just want great vocals. With Richie gone Bounce does that for me nowadays. The only reason why I preferred Bon Jovi before Richie left was because of Richie as Jon's voice left much to be desired. You on the other hand seem to prefer a singer who can't sing but is capable of running on stage.
Just because our preferences are different doesn't mean either of us is wrong as to what we prefer. Saying Jon's a better singer out of the two while the other's actually singing the stuff in the right key is though. No amount of charisma can take that away.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rokenrola
(Post 1249446)
And what is your reason to call BJ cover band today? Because of Jons voice or because Richie is not there?
An insult is to call great band a cover band without any evidence. We all know what is the cover band and BJ arent that for sure.
|
I'm just wondering; what to you is a cover band then?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bonjovi90
(Post 1249464)
Yeah that accent mash-up or whatever that is is something that I don't like too much either. I think it may be due to the guitarist and him having an acoustic cover band as well where they play all sorts of pop/rock tunes and him liking to partly imitate accents of other artists there as well might've lead to this. However, I've heard other people from the Ruhrpott speak English and some of them just sound as horrendous accent-wise :mrgreen:
|
I've yet to meet someone from Germany who's capable of speaking English without the dodgy main klain zain accent. :D
Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan
|