What do photoshopped pictures have to do with being a dick? I bet 99% of professional photos you see of celebrities are enhanced in some way. Haven't we all see the videos of the difference between how a model actually looks and how their photo looks on a magazine cover? They make you thinner, give you a bigger bust if you're female, take away the lines, etc.
I'm sure Richie is quite capable of being just as much of a dick as the next guy, but I don't think having a picture where he looks like an airbrushed duck is indicative of that. |
This thread has deteriorated into the prominent minions on this board that champion either Jon or Richie squabbling about who has the more embarrassing set of photos (it's almost undoubtedly Jon btw, but whatever). I mean we're arguing about whose genetically altered faces are less repugnant. I think this is all a sign that we've run out of things to talk about and this thread doesn't deserve to reach 10,000 posts.
Can't we just all agree that Richie is an easily manipulated, emotionally stunted buffoon who probably won't return to the band, and Jon's a smug jackass and it kind of serves him right anyways? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
By the way guys, I'm in Jersey! :P |
Quote:
Richie's photo is shit, it's fact. Does it mean all his photos are crap? No but that one photo is crap. No other ways of looking at it. He might take a photo today which is fantastic, good for him. No one can say anything bad a photo? This need to bring Jon into the mix is pathetic. Why not Tico? Why not David? |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jon may be a controlling jerk and has made some bad decisions (this album/tour), but I think Richie needs someone like Jon, a leader, focused and very aware of what needs to be done. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Jon solo does not need Richie either. BON JOVI need Jon and Richie urgently, because they are the key. |
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.