Captain_jovi |
01-24-2020 03:11 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackieBlue
(Post 1261025)
Ok, I lied.
Well, yeah, according to Bob Rock, it seems like it was at least headed in that direction as far back as KTF.
You may be right and the atttendance might be similar if he promoted it as JBJ; but I doubt it. If that's the case, there are a couple of points you make that I still don't understand. In your previous post you said if it isn't promoted as "playing songs from his new solo album"... If it's all the same to most fans, why that would that be an issue? Wouldn't they likely be just as excited about a tour supporting a new solo album by Jon Bon Jovi as they would about a new album from the band?
Also, I'm not sure why you think calling it Jon Bon Jovi would be more of an option now than it was when Richie was still in the band. If it's been about Jon since 2000, why would that make a difference?
|
That's a fair point, if people aren't going to see the new album it won't matter if it's promoted as a JBJ album or a band album.
I think when Richie was in the band he did so much of the work and was so important to the sound and the co-writes, the guitar, the backing vocals. It felt like almost just as much his band. You can't really say the same for Tico and Dave (at least up until a certain point) Post 2000 they all got watered down so much that you can't really tell who is them and what is John Shanks on synth.
With no Richie and less co-writes from the proper band it's way more feasible and I don't think America would care. That being said, that's America, I'm not sure in other countries how it would fly. Of the three fanbases (the ones who know the hits, the casuals and the diehards) we're such a slim percentage of what's following a band that is just kind of there doing 40 shows a year.
|