|
Quote:
And I've called you out on this before... Here is an example of what you do. "I hate seafood, but I eat fish, lobster, crab, and shrimp" or in this case "day one, song one is just a front to show the whole band playing on the album but I'm sure they all did play on it at some point" "When it was first released, I said the sole purpose of "Day One, Song One" was to provide video evidence people would be able to point to later, and say, "I'm sure it was a band album. I remember seeing videos of everybody in the studio together." I was half-kidding then; but I'm not entirely sure, now, that I wasn't also more than half-right" |
C’mon guys. Let’s not ruin another thread here ...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Hey World’sMost, if you want write me an email… maybe that calm you down… Geez!
|
Quote:
Do you understand the difference between 1) being involved in the creation of a song, and 2) just playing what's been laid out for you to play on an instrument? When Jon says "it's a band album" he is clearly implying that the whole band had a part in creating the album and making it what it is. Actively participating in the creative process; for example, suggesting changes that significantly impact the sound - and having those ideas actually implemented. Think of the Popeye story Jon told about Tico and New Years Eve; where Jon had written it in waltz fashion and Tico said, "Huh-uh. THIS is what it needs to be..." And it significantly changed the song. It's that kind of involvement that I'm not sure the band has on the whole album, regardless of what Jon has said about it being a band album; and that's what was obviously being promoted with the Day One, Song One video. It's completely different from simply popping in, after Jon and Shanks have everything laid out, long enough to play or overdub what Jon and Shanks envisioned. If you remember, that's where Jon said he went wrong prior to THINFS; because he and Shanks would work everything out beforehand; and then everyone else came for a day or so and recorded, basically, whatever Jon and Shanks told them to play. THAT is "playing" on the record, imo. And I have no doubt they have done that in the past, or that they still do. It's the creative part I question. |
I'm going to start making up my own terms...
It's a great song but_____ - The content is too choppy - The verses aren't fragmented enough - The chorus is simplified - The melody comes off wavy - There are too many adjectives and not enough adverbs. - The lyrics are all over the place (wait, I can't take credit for that one. It was actual used). Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk |
Quote:
That was actually pretty funny, RDK! :) |
Quote:
Hahaha that was good ! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
I really enjoyed Not Running Anymore. Unbroken I don't like at all. Just because you don't understand a comment it doesn't mean it has no meaning. ;) I already explained what I meant by forced, but as usual you only take in what you want to take in.... There's no point debating things with you because you always refuse to see anyones point of view but your own. I don't like it, you do. It's all good. BonJovi90 already confirmed that negative posts they saw dissapeared later....Here's an example of how the song is really going down on an unmoderated/non-BJ fan page....read the comments here: https://www.facebook.com/ClassicRock...57603991885883 |
Quote:
Read my post properly Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk |
Quote:
The topic of the album is just utterly boring, same old liberal left wing shite that has been forced down everyone's throats for the last decade. What's happened to the fun rock n roll band we used to love? Jon has basically sold out Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 04:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.