![]() |
Pres. Election
Sorry if this has been done before, but I am very curious as to what you guys think.
|
Yup, been done before. :P
|
From the US, voting for Badnarik.
Adrian |
i don't think there's any real difference between these two canditates at all but if i had to choose i'd choose kerry.
|
Quote:
The differences are big enough to matter in about everything that's important when you're in the seat they're running for. I voted for Kerry. I supported him before but imo the debates made it clear as can be that he can do a much better job than Bush. I particularly appreciated this statement answering how he handles criticism from Catholic archbishops for protecting the right for abortion : Quote:
Ponrauil |
Amen, Bush was so full of religious bollocks last night I couldnt stop laughing..he truely thinks hes on some kind of god-given mission to save the world :lol: :lol:
|
Quote:
i haven't focused on their programmes about domestic politics so i can't be sure. but i have started 'studying' (i have a paper in uni) kerry's political programme about war, diplomacy, foreign policy etc. they seem that they both want the same thing but they disagree (not all the times) on the means. that's the way i see it right now. |
Kerry can't afford to propose a totally different foreign policy. Even now the polls show Americans prefer Bush when it comes to Iraq and terrorism. So if Kerry said I'll consult UN before protecting our security interests, I'll withdraw from Iraq if I get elected, etc, that would surely be a political suicide.
|
Keep in mind that Kerry voted for going to war with Iraq, another reason why he just couldn't pull the troops out of there.
|
Quote:
Not because of intelligence, but because when Bush asked to be given the power to go to war, he promised he had a plan, that he'll go to war as a last resort and that he'll build a strong coallition, none of which he did. Plus he never said he'd pull the troops out of Iraq on his first day as President, he said he'd bring more strong allies back to the table to be more efficient on the ground and build a strong and safe plan, that doesn't exist today with Bush, for the reconstruction of Iraq. If things went along like in his plan, the troops would still be in Iraq for at least four years. Ponrauil |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.