![]() |
wait a minute you're talking about liberal bias in the media and using a righty whacko's blog that makes a tonne of unsubstantiated claims that snopes probably wouldn't even waste their time on to fight back?
|
speaking of the good people at snopes: http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp
|
Quote:
Like I said, we've got the media INVENTING lies about Sarah Palin, but they won't give a moment's consideration to the possibility that BHO might've lied to us? Even if it turns out to be fake, shouldn't we still have heard about it? Or would that interrupt the 96 straight hours of Palin criticism? Adrian |
Quote:
you and i both know that if there was even close to an iota of truth in that dudes blog then bill reilly, limbaugh et al would be ramming it down our throats. |
Still, explain to me how there's no bias when this ain't even a blip on the radar, and everybody and his brother is making shit up about Palin and getting airtime with it? It's garbage and falsified and lies when it comes to BHO, but anything goes with the Republicans?
Why is information about BHO held to a higher level of scrutiny than McCain and Co? How is that not an indication of bias? Adrian |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i just saw a video of obama making a speech during a wwf wrestling show. your elections trully are a circus. |
any msm links to this?
i had a quick scour round the politics forum i post on and the thread on it hit over 100 posts but the only link i can see is from the OP with a link to some stupid blog which i don't trust even though her daughter does look somewhat up the proverbial duff in the pictures on it. |
the good folk at reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNe...rpc=22&sp=true
the article mentions the rumours circulating on blogs about the baby cover up but makes no mention of reputable sources following suit.... |
It seems Bristol Palin is pregnant NOW...
My thought process upon hearing this ran through three phases. Before y'all jump on me, there is some sarcasm here. 1.Huh. 2.I'd like to kick both her and the father in the crotch for doing something so stupid that could do any sort of damage to the PRESIDENTIAL campaign for the supposed "family values" party. 3.The Democrats won't be able to attack her for having a child out of wedlock, that's like 3/4 of their voter base, so they can't really say anything about it. hahahaha Adrian |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.