![]() |
Quote:
Surely you've read some of Sebs reviews of Bon Jovi shows which he has criticised alot yet everyone else enjoyed immensly? Twickenham last tour for example, a good if not great show by most peoples standards but feeble by his if i recall correctly. U2 live in person is an amazing experiance and also a great stage show. I am certainly looking forward to Dublin in 24hrs time! andi |
Aloha !
Quote:
And just to be clear: when we were having the "Jovitalk afterparty" at Planet Hollywood after the Twickenham shows most of us agreed with my opinion about Twickenham. And about none of us enjoyed it immensely like you're saying they did. U2 in Dublin will be pretty different compared to U2 in Amsterdam, I guess. Still, Bono has lost it, and without their fancy lightshows there'd be nothing left of them. If U2 would do club shows it would become pretty clear of how much they need the lights, screens and fancy stages. Salaam Aleikum, Sebastiaan |
I agree with Seb on Twickenham Night 2. However, I enjoyed Night 1. Having said that, I wasn't at Amsterdam or Frankfurt, so I can see where his reviews stemn from.
And I still haven't forgiven Jon after reading what the setlist for Night 2 was supposed to be: Quote:
|
I did enjoy Twickenham night 2, but it wasn't as good as the Glasgow show. But Blaze that night was pretty much the best I've ever heard.
And if they played that setlist, it would have been so much better. It was all about expectation though.... Anyway, onto topic... I'll keep my tickets, go to the show, and then probably be justified in what I was waying in that Jovi via U2 thread - that BJ are just a so much better live band. But if I'm proved wrong you'll also all be the first to hear about it. |
You won't be proved wrong.
Don't get me wrong. I enjoyed seeing U2 live with their big stage and lights. But that is it. I salute you, Thunderstrucker |
Quote:
Anyways to get back ontopic about U2, their setlist seems good to me... a little heavy on new songs but that is always to be expected. U2 have several truely amazing songs, including the 'big 3' of the Joshua tree which in my opinion are untouchable and worth the ticket price alone, but i do agree that Bon Jovi are a better live act and have a stronger back catalogue. Quote:
andi |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Worth the price of admission alone for ''Where the streets have no name'' live, which is one reason why I will always go and see a U2 show when they tour. andi |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Read the reviews from fans in this topic. A lot of them thought U2 were poor, others thought they were good. That's not groundbreaking in my opinion. It's hit and miss, something Bon Jovi did not do on the Lost Highway tour, they were on form for pretty much every show. |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.