| Jeeper |
09-10-2016 06:01 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by jovifan85
(Post 1206378)
We have to accept Jon as we have him. Would their production be different Today? I don't know? Remember this isn't the Jon, Bob Rock worked with.
My view is the production may change if Jon loses John Shanks, but not by much. Why his Voice, is the main reason. If his voice was in better shape perhaps we would have better production, like a HAND Album at best!
I love Bon Jovi, but for worse we have the production we have due to his voice and age.
|
I agree regarding the voice. Personally, Jon generally doesn't sound too bad on albums. (granted, there are some songs or lines which are not his best delivery) I don't really know if any other producer could help him or disguise it better than Shanks does.
It's all guesswork but I feel Shanks is a safety net for Jon. And people often lose passion when they are content. Shanks may well be simply doing as his employer asks. Or he may be guiding and advising the band more than we know.
How many times have we heard a BJ song/album over the past decade and thought, "it's decent, I quite like that part but why no solo, why bury the guitars, why no extended outros etc? I have on every release.
Is Shanks the problem? I hear lots of songs with potential that never quite fulfil it. Isn't the sign of a good producer someone who brings out the best in an artist, who has ideas and suggestions that enhance a song? Going off past history, I'd say Fairbairn and Rock are more likely to do that with a band like Jovi than Shanks.
|