![]() |
Quote:
http://drycounty.com/jovitalk/bon-jo...nesday-t69723/ But he has certainly been known to rake Bon Jovi over the coals - especially after the 2007 Prudential shows: As for Bon Jovi, majorly dissapointed to say the least. I have followed this bands history since the beginning, from opening act to 38 Special, to one of the biggest bands on the planet. I always had a huge respect for the group, and as a Jersey guy myself, always liked how proud they were to be a NJ band. Obviously they were never a metal band, but they were a high energy semi hard rock group at one time, and Jon was one of the best frontmen out there. Lets not forget Jon is the guy that gave us Cinderella and Skid Row and spawned the entire pop metal 80's scene! Something he wants no part of now clearly. And that's fine because Bon Jovi is the only band from the era and scene that has a MAJOR career now, so I get it. But what I do not get is how Jon Bon Jovi has gone from being one of the great frontmen in rock, to a guy that looks like he's going through the motions on stage? This guy RULED the stage at one time, now he just struts, smiles and poses here and there. Steven Tyler has 15 years on him and works circles around him on stage. Bon Jovi these days barely resembles a rock act, and Jon is clearly trying to be the next Springsteen, but still doesn't work on stage as hard as Bruce does now. He's even building his own E Street band with extra backing musicians on stage. It's now an 8 member band live, with a female fiddle player who played on almost the entire set. She even put fiddle in some of the old school rocking stuff! Even that stuff was diluted and had no real energy or edge. This is sad beyond belief and even more shocking is that Jon never gets called on it! Look at the explosive rock act this was in the 80's compared to what they have become. |
Somebody call rolo, he has to dust off his great photoshopping skills
On one side of the ring... Matt the dude with the famous last name who mistakes rudeness with sarcasm 10 times out of 10. Oh, and sometimes he pretends to be a spokesperson for some famous band and have some inside knowledge (read this in a Littlefinger accent, any of them), until someone calls him on it and then acts all offended. And on the other... Eddie, the dude who loves to hear his voice more than anything and rant about how mean other people are to him and then proceeds to either kiss their asses or be extremely rude when they are trying to apologize/explain. Oh, and he apparently has an ax to grind with a famous singer whose name may or may not rhyme with a certain famous tomato sauce. Matt's reputation precedes him (ie the majority of people outside this board will never believe a word he says) and Eddie's obvious interest in turning this small "anecdote" into a big drama for his own profit negates any valid points he could make. Who cares about fact-checking right? Or about STFU when there's an official channel for official statements? These two ugh :rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I too think that Phil is underused, he's sometimes walking around playing air guitar and making silly faces while Shanks is soloing (I'm exaggerating of course, but he could and should be playing more parts). I'm not a fan of Shanks' playing and I feel that there's too much spotlight on him. Nothing against him at all, he obviously suits BJ much better than Bobby, but I liked Bobby's minimal stage presence and I don't think that Shanks should be so upfront. It's not as if they shine more spotlight on Phil, it'll feel like the real BJ again, but it kinda makes sense to have the lead guitarist of a rock band to ... lead a little bit, even taking into consideration that he has to be somewhat restricted to fit his current role until fans get used to him. Splitting lead guitar so many times during the show won't probably be an issue for many fans, sure, but I personally feel the stage looks too crowded and Jon has to pretend to bond with two dudes instead of one, too exhausting. It detracts from the experience, makes it more obvious that this bunch of people don't have a lot of stage chemistry Jon's voice was very prominent in Philadelphia judging by YT videos, maybe this time it was the arena's acoustics? Or he knew his voice would be weaker and didn't want to feel too exposed? I say this because there's been some comments here from other shows about how it'd be better if they lower Jon to allow all the backing vocals to cover him because he's too high most of the time. Hell, most reviews are pointing this, his vocal decline and how good the others are at backing him |
Quote:
|
Do forgive if this has already been noticed, i couldn't find in the 30 pages...But at the 4:13 mark when Jon realizes somethings not right and points to Dave who's not playing obviously, you can also see Tico has completely stopped also. Watched the video dozens of times and just saw it. Then at the 4:19 mark clearly he can be seen and heard start hitting the drums again as if he figured out what was happening and tried to match the track blaring. To me this is evidence they're all playing and singing and it Actually was a big O'l goof on someones part...Who's probably now has his "strong hands on the unemployment line"
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
I don't wanna be disrespectful but there's no other way to ask you:
HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THAT YOU ARE SUFFERING HEARING PROBLEMS? |
Quote:
Come on people, what is this obsession with arguing? Or is it that there are other motives here? For instance oooh look how bad the band is now after Richie left! Bon Jovi is and always been a live band, they don't lip sync, dont need to. If a song is too hard on Jon's vocals they simply avoid playing it. I have been a fan for 20 some years, lip sync is not in the catalogue. |
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.