It's in the first post. Audibles were Runaway & Blood On Blood.

They've even just given up with the printing of the setlists. That's literally going to be tomorrows setlist too. First 20, Audibles, Wanted, Prayer. Disappointing.

The guitar techs have a bunch of different setlists under the stage posted on their pin boards not from any particular show though but it gives an outline of what keys the songs are in and what guitars are needed. I saw one setlist (maybe from rehearsal?) Where the show goes THINFS to Knockout to Wild In the Streets to Bad name.

Wild in the Streets? Now that is one I'd give an arm and a leg to hear.

MWAHAHA!
I saw what you did there! ;)

Definitely don't want to hear Jon butcher that one


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Judging from a video on the Phil X Fan club facebook page it seems like Jon did the first verse and chorus of Blood On Blood acoustic, then the rest of the band joined in after the chorus.

Seriously?? You don't want the set-lists changed because you don't want to hear him song other songs with his current voice? Doesn't make any sense to me.

For me this is best setlist so far of the tour. I only would have added Living With the Ghost and Working Man instead of We Got I Goin' On and Whole Lot of Leavin'. Also think they should have include all the audibles to the setlist, to get a longer setlist, but that's me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wishful thinking but since Shanks does the solo for Knockout and Phil for We Don't Run, a setlist wouldnt exist with black dots on both. The black dots representing backing tracks makes the most sense but still isn't 100 percent confirmed.

You'd think if that was the reason they were there they wouldn't post those setlists online for all to see, people start asking questions at that point.

Is that rhetorical? Because I have no idea what you would do. :p


You didn't ask me, but if that were the case I'd tell you the troll is a copycat who stole the identity and style of another fan.

Rosa3 and I go way back on other boards. We rarely agree on everything and I agree with you that nobody has any business telling ppl what they should post; or say that they aren't good fans if they are critcal.

But I will say this: it's a rare fan, especially among those who are pro-Jon or pro-Richie, who can even acknowledge that there are 2 sides. The main line of defense for some of them is to point out flaws or weaknesses in the other guy so their guy comes out on top by comparison. Some fans on both sides actually seem to spend more time digging up dirt or bad press on "the other one" than they spend looking for real news about their hero. Kinda sick.

Rosa3 isn't like that. She's one of the few fans I know who can defend Jon without trashing Richie (or the other way around). In fact, she rarely says anything bad about anyone altho she can make critical comments to people at times, like she has here. Personally, I'll take the more direct method every time. If someone doesn't agree with me, I'd much rather they talk to me, not about me.

Just had to say that...

Carry on!