![]() |
nasvhille, tn 2-14-03 cds for trade
will trade these cds ONLY for other BJ cds of KNOWN source (i.e. known mics/recording deck, known analog/digital generation, etc.).
i do not want MP3-sourced stuff, or outtakes/demos (i already have a 25 cd set of outtakes/demos/etc. with everything pre-Bounce). e-me with any offers at: h_vargas_2001@yahoo.com . |
A hardcore collector then, huh? :wink: How many other good-quality boots do you have then in addition to this Nashville show?
I've heard rumours about these real hc collectors who only trade amongs themselves cause they don't want to share their stuff or get any "regular" boots in return... Are you by any chance one of them? ;) With my +15 years old stereo set it really doesn't matter one bit if the songs have been mp3s in between or if they're a first generation copy of a digital master recording... :roll: The only thing that matters to me is whether the recording is soundboard or audience, and if it's audience, is it a good one or a bad one. Everything else is meaningless, LOL. |
Jovian wrote:
>A hardcore collector then, huh? How many other good-quality boots do >you have then in addition to this Nashville show? [/color] i have tons of good quality boots other than the BJ / Nash. show.[/color] >I've heard rumours about these real hc collectors who only trade >amongs themselves cause they don't want to share their stuff or get >any "regular" boots in return... Are you by any chance one of them? i only trade for known-sourced stuff, if that's what you mean. if a show is taped and then there are 10 different sources of it, i want to know what the source info is for the version(s) that i get so that i don't end up getting the same version again by mistake. plus, if there's a version of a show recorded from the analog/digital master onto CDR, then i'd generally rather have that than a CDR copy from unknown generation analog tapes filled with hiss. if my keeping up with info about the shows i collect classifies me as a "hardcore (a.k.a. 'hc') trader," fine, that's what i am. i try to get the best quality possible in the first place, instead of sub-par quality copies and keep on trading 3-5 times for the same show to get a decent version. >With my +15 years old stereo set it really doesn't matter one bit if the >songs have been mp3s in between or if they're a first generation copy of >a digital master recording... maybe it's time for a new sound system. (not trying to rip on your equipment), but to quote someone else on a different message board: "i hear huge differences between my masters and mp3 copies. i didn't spend the $$ i did on recording gear so someone could butcher the recording by MP3ing it." (- Scott Brown) >The only thing that matters to me is whether the recording is >soundboard or audience, and if it's audience, is it a good one or a bad >one. Everything else is meaningless, LOL. that's fine for you. as i said before, i want the best quality/version possible, and i do not have time and do not want to waste time on inferior copies. in many/most trading circles, MP3-sourced stuff is a no-no. the only reason i mentioned it is because it seems that the "Bon Jovi trading community" here seems big on trading MP3 stuff, and i want quality not compressed crap. i'll again quote Scott Brown (from another message board): "if you want to MP3 my shows, then i just won't spread my future shows. you can't mp3 what you don't have. that simple." not trying to be mean... i don't want my stuff on ebay being sold by some jerk who downloaded MP3s of it. i've seen that type of thing happen all too often. MP3s are fine for a sound sample, but the quality is definitely not as good as pure sources. that's a fact. MP3s kill the highend on recordings and i'm not keen on getting crappy-sounding MP3 stuff. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11.
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.