Quote:
Originally Posted by Supersonic
Aloha !
All these supposed youTube experts keep hammering on lack of practice and training while Jon's gone out on tour with vocal coaches. Since 1991 there's several coaches who have publicly thanked him for his service just like Jon has mentioned vocal coaches in the past for bringing his voice back from the dead. I'd say the fact that he's gone out on tour even with his coach in 2018 and yet those experts on youTube claiming the opposite either means that Jon's ignoring the advice from his coaches or the experts are full of shit. Or, I reckon, a little bit of both.
A coach can teach him how to use his voice, tell him not to overdo it but considering every schedule since 1993 has been packed I'd say money's always been more important than the health of his vocals. It's a miracle it's held up for as long as it did.
Salaam Aleikum,
Sebastiaan
|
Well said, but I would add two more factors to the equation - show length and vocal demand of the catalogue. It's a dangerous combination and Jon had an unfavorable tendency for both.
When some artists record, they consciously think abut how will they sing those songs live. It never seemed to be Jon, as he never appeared to be able to sing LOAP exactly like recorded, or songs like ITA and TD and many others, which would get downtuned live by half-step as soon as it's realeased. Even prime 1992 really struggled to sing Stick To Your Guns in original key during those "An Evening With" rehearsals, which is not considered one of the most demanding songs. It seems like Jon always tried to max himself out in the studio and only start worrying about live performing later Perhaps his decline would not have been as sharp if we wasn't pushing himself to sing things like Always well in his late 40s and early 50s, in the same key as he did in his mid-30s (albeit downtuned).
Also, if money was a priority for Jon (it was), he would not have lost on any revenue if he played the 1.5-2 hour shows like most others do, unlike the usual 2h15-2h45 range they usually did during the 1996-2013 period. Someone like a Steven Tyler has sung a very demanding style and still sounds good-to-great, but Aerosmith shows are 17-18 songs, whereas Paul McCartney, who's a tenor with great longevity until mid-00s, has showed great vocal decline in the past 15 years. Lots of other artists who get away with long shows, e.g. Bruce or Pearl Jam or Green Day, are baritones and such voices typically hold up much better with age, even if none of them appear to be well-trained singers. But again, in his weird mind Jon probably took pride in doing lengthy shows with multiple setlist changes (including digging up songs in old arrangements that he should stay away from), as this is what his idol Bruce did.
But again, these factors (+ what you listed + lifestyle choices we did not mention) could all be summarized as Jon never prioritized the longevity of his instrument and is paying the price for it.